CDBMF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
26.59M
CGMLF
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.10 (+9.52%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDBMF vs CGMLF

Header iconCDBMF vs CGMLF Comparison
Open Charts CDBMF vs CGMLFBanner chart's image
Cordoba Minerals
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization26.59M
Chalice Mining
Price$1.15
Change+$0.10 (+9.52%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization1.55B
CDBMF vs CGMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDBMF vs. CGMLF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDBMF is a Hold and CGMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CDBMF: $0.53 vs. CGMLF: $1.15)
Brand notoriety: CDBMF and CGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDBMF: 172% vs. CGMLF: 12%
Market capitalization -- CDBMF: $26.59M vs. CGMLF: $1.55B
CDBMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $26.59M. CGMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDBMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDBMF and CGMLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDBMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDBMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGMLF is a better buy in the short-term than CDBMF.

Price Growth

CDBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than CDBMF($26.6M). CDBMF YTD gains are higher at: 89.350 vs. CGMLF (81.102). CDBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -31.74M vs. CGMLF (-70.16M). CGMLF has more cash in the bank: 115M vs. CDBMF (1.15M). CGMLF has less debt than CDBMF: CGMLF (349K) vs CDBMF (651K). CGMLF has higher revenues than CDBMF: CGMLF (125K) vs CDBMF (0).
CDBMFCGMLFCDBMF / CGMLF
Capitalization26.6M1.55B2%
EBITDA-31.74M-70.16M45%
Gain YTD89.35081.102110%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0125K-
Total Cash1.15M115M1%
Total Debt651K349K187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDBMF vs CGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
CDBMF
CGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDBMF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (96). This means that CDBMF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (100). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (99). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (38). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (100). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDBMFCGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZFIX9.850.02
+0.20%
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
SCSMX22.62N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth C
SGLYX11.17N/A
N/A
SEI Global Managed Volatility Y (SIMT)
JMVYX37.67N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R6
DESCX22.65N/A
N/A
DWS ESG Core Equity C

CDBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDBMF and SFRRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDBMF and SFRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDBMF
1D Price
Change %
CDBMF100%
N/A
SFRRF - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHXMF - CDBMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CBBHF - CDBMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+10.16%
CGMLF - CDBMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBBLF - CDBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and NAK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and NAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMLF
1D Price
Change %
CGMLF100%
N/A
NAK - CGMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CVVUF - CGMLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
PMETF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
GLNCY - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
ATOXF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
More