Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDCRX vs FXAIX
CDCRX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDCRX vs FXAIX
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund
Price$11.90
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.05M
CDCRX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDCRX vs. FXAIX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDCRX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. CDCRX (30.1M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDCRX: FXAIX (1.19) vs CDCRX (0.00). CDCRX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDCRX (14 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CDCRX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDCRX: FXAIX (0) vs CDCRX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.42 vs. CDCRX (-8.78). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.50 vs. CDCRX (10.23).
| CDCRX | FXAIX | CDCRX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.01 | 19,267% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.146 | 10.839 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.1M | 682B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.78 | 16.42 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.95 | 66.58 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.23 | 98.50 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.30 | 256.66 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement