Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$15.03
Change-$0.09 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.86M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. CDGCX (60.9M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.20) vs CDGCX (0.31). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (21 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CDGCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. CDGCX (6.12). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 111.82 vs. CDGCX (36.78).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.577 | 7.154 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.9M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.20 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 13.57 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.87 | 71.44 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.78 | 111.82 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.90 | 226.07 | 14% |