Ad is loading...
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$14.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.61M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. CDGCX (57.6M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.34) vs CDGCX (0.37). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (21 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CDGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. CDGCX (1.31). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.52 vs. CDGCX (37.55).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.545 | -3.312 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.6M | 594B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.34 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.31 | 10.05 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.38 | 48.16 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.55 | 108.52 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.54 | 194.96 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...