Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$15.01
Change+$0.22 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.08M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Nov 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. CDGCX (59.1M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs CDGCX (0.25). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (22 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). CDGCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. CDGCX (-0.39). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 99.71 vs. CDGCX (22.45).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.454 | 13.521 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.1M | 737B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.11 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 12.40 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.28 | 72.20 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.45 | 99.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.91 | 247.71 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement