Ad is loading...
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$13.37
Change+$0.07 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.42M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. CDGCX (53.4M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.30) vs CDGCX (0.37). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (21 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CDGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. CDGCX (-1.47). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.09 vs. CDGCX (28.35).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.955 | -9.974 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.4M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.30 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.47 | 6.45 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.10 | 25.76 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.35 | 98.09 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.58 | 174.86 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers