Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$15.13
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.04M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. CDGCX (61M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.16) vs CDGCX (0.30). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (22 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CDGCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. CDGCX (2.83). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.31 vs. CDGCX (28.80).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.878 | 11.505 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61M | 696B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.16 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.83 | 19.68 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 73.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.80 | 104.31 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.37 | 262.15 | 17% |