Ad is loading...
CDGRX vs FSMAX
CDGRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CDGRX vs FSMAX
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund
Price$11.87
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.07M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$84.65
Change+$1.43 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
CDGRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGRX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. CDGRX (31.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CDGRX: FSMAX (0.53) vs CDGRX (0.12). CDGRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CDGRX (14 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CDGRX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGRX: FSMAX (0) vs CDGRX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. CDGRX (-10.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.79 vs. CDGRX (26.78).
| CDGRX | FSMAX | CDGRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.04 | 3,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.397 | -8.429 | 52% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.1M | 36.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.53 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.76 | 2.49 | -432% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.93 | 7.51 | -132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.78 | 102.79 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.69 | 55.37 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers