CDGXF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
373.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMSOF
Price
$2.23
Change
+$0.52 (+30.41%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDGXF vs SMSOF

Header iconCDGXF vs SMSOF Comparison
Open Charts CDGXF vs SMSOFBanner chart's image
China Dongxiang Group
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization373.49M
SAMSONITE GROUP S A
Price$2.23
Change+$0.52 (+30.41%)
Volume$165.6K
Capitalization3.4B
CDGXF vs SMSOF Comparison Chart in %
CDGXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMSOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDGXF vs. SMSOF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGXF is a Hold and SMSOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CDGXF: $0.06 vs. SMSOF: $2.23)
Brand notoriety: CDGXF and SMSOF are both not notable
CDGXF represents the Apparel/Footwear, while SMSOF is part of the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDGXF: 118% vs. SMSOF: 1109%
Market capitalization -- CDGXF: $369.63M vs. SMSOF: $3.38B
CDGXF [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $369.63M. SMSOF’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $3.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $29.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $92.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $3.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $7.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDGXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDGXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMSOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSOF is a better buy in the long-term than CDGXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDGXF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDGXF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SMSOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMSOF is a better buy in the short-term than CDGXF.

Price Growth

CDGXF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -1.96% price change this week, while SMSOF (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +30.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -4.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.03%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-4.32% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

@Wholesale Distributors (-1.10% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMSOF($3.4B) has a higher market cap than CDGXF($373M). CDGXF has higher P/E ratio than SMSOF: CDGXF (12.60) vs SMSOF (10.80). CDGXF YTD gains are higher at: 56.625 vs. SMSOF (-11.583). SMSOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 843M vs. CDGXF (-155M). CDGXF has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. SMSOF (658M). CDGXF has less debt than SMSOF: CDGXF (47.1M) vs SMSOF (2.32B). SMSOF has higher revenues than CDGXF: SMSOF (3.59B) vs CDGXF (1.72B).
CDGXFSMSOFCDGXF / SMSOF
Capitalization373M3.4B11%
EBITDA-155M843M-18%
Gain YTD56.625-11.583-489%
P/E Ratio12.6010.80117%
Revenue1.72B3.59B48%
Total Cash4.23B658M643%
Total Debt47.1M2.32B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDGXF vs SMSOF: Fundamental Ratings
CDGXF
SMSOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
7472
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDGXF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSOF (38). This means that CDGXF’s stock grew similarly to SMSOF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDGXF (100). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDGXF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSOF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CDGXF (74). This means that SMSOF’s stock grew similarly to CDGXF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGXF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSOF (38). This means that CDGXF’s stock grew similarly to SMSOF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGXF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSOF (25). This means that CDGXF’s stock grew similarly to SMSOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDGXFSMSOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDGXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMSOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIEGX12.84N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Inv
RYMQX24.81N/A
N/A
Guggenheim Multi-Hedge Strategies A
RAGTX76.82N/A
N/A
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology A
JFAIX39.39N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R6
LTFOX20.87N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3

CDGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDGXF and SMSOF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDGXF and SMSOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDGXF
1D Price
Change %
CDGXF100%
N/A
SMSOF - CDGXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCCF - CDGXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSDGY - CDGXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSDGF - CDGXF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
BOSSY - CDGXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMSOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSOF and SMSEY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSOF and SMSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSOF
1D Price
Change %
SMSOF100%
N/A
SMSEY - SMSOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
CDGXF - SMSOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MONRY - SMSOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
PMMAF - SMSOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
MONRF - SMSOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
More