Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDHAX vs VFWPX
CDHAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts CDHAX vs VFWPX
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
Price$35.83
Change+$0.55 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.54
Change+$2.12 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
CDHAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDHAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. CDHAX (1.23B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than CDHAX: VFWPX (2.79) vs CDHAX (2.27). CDHAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: CDHAX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). CDHAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). CDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). CDHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: CDHAX (5000) vs VFWPX (100000000). CDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.04 vs. VFWPX (14.97). CDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.66 vs. VFWPX (40.23).
| CDHAX | VFWPX | CDHAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.03 | 1,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.03 | 2,167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.655 | 20.947 | 103% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 68.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 2.79 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 14.97 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.12 | 40.29 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.66 | 40.23 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement