Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDHAX vs VFWPX
CDHAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts CDHAX vs VFWPX
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
Price$36.22
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.50
Change-$0.42 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
CDHAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDHAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CDHAX (1.31B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than CDHAX: VFWPX (2.70) vs CDHAX (2.07). CDHAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: CDHAX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). CDHAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). CDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). CDHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: CDHAX (5000) vs VFWPX (100000000). CDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. VFWPX (21.62). CDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. VFWPX (33.14).
| CDHAX | VFWPX | CDHAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.03 | 1,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.03 | 2,167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.241 | 24.879 | 101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 2.70 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.34 | 21.62 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.56 | 45.59 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | 33.14 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.82 | 69.04 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement