Ad is loading...
CDIVX vs FSMAX
CDIVX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CDIVX vs FSMAX
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund
Price$11.65
Change+$0.12 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.07M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$84.65
Change+$1.43 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
CDIVX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDIVX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDIVX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. CDIVX (31.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CDIVX: FSMAX (0.53) vs CDIVX (0.28). CDIVX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CDIVX (12 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CDIVX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CDIVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDIVX: FSMAX (0) vs CDIVX (25000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. CDIVX (-12.20). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.79 vs. CDIVX (25.48).
| CDIVX | FSMAX | CDIVX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.04 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.726 | -8.429 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.1M | 36.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.53 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.20 | 2.49 | -489% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.15 | 7.51 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.48 | 102.79 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.91 | 55.37 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...