CDNAF
Price
$128.34
Change
+$2.55 (+2.03%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
8B
LAD
Price
$316.90
Change
+$0.54 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.28B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs LAD

Header iconCDNAF vs LAD Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs LADBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$128.34
Change+$2.55 (+2.03%)
Volume$12.37K
Capitalization8B
Lithia Motors
Price$316.90
Change+$0.54 (+0.17%)
Volume$400
Capitalization8.28B
CDNAF vs LAD Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. LAD commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LAD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $128.34 vs. LAD: $316.36)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and LAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 13% vs. LAD: 63%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $8B vs. LAD: $8.28B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8B. LAD’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAD is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.79% price change this week, while LAD (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAD is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.34% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($8.28B) and CDNAF($8B) have the same market capitalization . CDNAF has higher P/E ratio than LAD: CDNAF (12.22) vs LAD (8.15). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 22.347 vs. LAD (-11.179). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. LAD (1.98B). LAD has more cash in the bank: 941M vs. CDNAF (489M). CDNAF has less debt than LAD: CDNAF (8.38B) vs LAD (11.3B). LAD has higher revenues than CDNAF: LAD (31B) vs CDNAF (17.7B).
CDNAFLADCDNAF / LAD
Capitalization8B8.28B97%
EBITDA2.22B1.98B112%
Gain YTD22.347-11.179-200%
P/E Ratio12.228.15150%
Revenue17.7B31B57%
Total Cash489M941M52%
Total Debt8.38B11.3B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs LAD: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
LAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
299
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5143
SMR RATING
1..100
5458
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (56) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (51) in the null industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as LAD (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LAD (51) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNAF (97) in the null industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEMAX23.19N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq A
QRSVX40.11N/A
N/A
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Inv
BRSYX13.82N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R6
TROIX14.42N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock I
MOJCX14.11N/A
N/A
Donoghue Forlines Momentum C

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+2.03%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More