CDNAF
Price
$124.23
Change
-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
6.86B
LAD
Price
$336.68
Change
-$1.83 (-0.54%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.68B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs LAD

Header iconCDNAF vs LAD Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs LADBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$124.23
Change-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Volume$7.7K
Capitalization6.86B
Lithia Motors
Price$336.68
Change-$1.83 (-0.54%)
Volume$2.75K
Capitalization8.68B
CDNAF vs LAD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. LAD commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LAD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $124.23 vs. LAD: $338.51)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and LAD are both not notable
CDNAF represents the Specialty Stores, while LAD is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 8% vs. LAD: 101%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $6.86B vs. LAD: $8.68B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.86B. LAD’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $8.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.16B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $52.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.07B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAD is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the short-term than LAD.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +9.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAD is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.72% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.68% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($8.68B) has a higher market cap than CDNAF($6.86B). CDNAF has higher P/E ratio than LAD: CDNAF (11.72) vs LAD (10.04). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 18.427 vs. LAD (-4.781). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.37B vs. CDNAF (2.03B). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. LAD (404M). CDNAF has less debt than LAD: CDNAF (7.62B) vs LAD (14.3B). LAD has higher revenues than CDNAF: LAD (37.2B) vs CDNAF (16.7B).
CDNAFLADCDNAF / LAD
Capitalization6.86B8.68B79%
EBITDA2.03B2.37B86%
Gain YTD18.427-4.781-385%
P/E Ratio11.7210.04117%
Revenue16.7B37.2B45%
Total Cash1.19B404M295%
Total Debt7.62B14.3B53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs LAD: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
LAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7065
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as LAD (41) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (70) in the null industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's SMR Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (100) in the null industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (57) in the null industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (100) in the null industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFLAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWET12.630.19
+1.53%
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
QCJL22.970.07
+0.30%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jul
DFGX53.490.07
+0.13%
Dimensional Global ex US Cor Fxd Inc ETF
CAMX31.71N/A
N/A
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
BUSA34.67-0.05
-0.14%
Brandes U.S. Value ETF

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
-0.22%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More