CDNTF
Price
$195.44
Change
+$8.68 (+4.65%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.84B
MTAGF
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.41 (-13.18%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNTF vs MTAGF

Header iconCDNTF vs MTAGF Comparison
Open Charts CDNTF vs MTAGFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$195.44
Change+$8.68 (+4.65%)
Volume$1
Capitalization5.84B
Ceconomy AG
Price$2.70
Change-$0.41 (-13.18%)
Volume$7.65K
Capitalization1.46B
CDNTF vs MTAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNTF vs. MTAGF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNTF is a Hold and MTAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNTF: $195.43 vs. MTAGF: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: CDNTF and MTAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNTF: 4% vs. MTAGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CDNTF: $5.84B vs. MTAGF: $1.46B
CDNTF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $5.84B. MTAGF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTAGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNTF is a better buy in the long-term than MTAGF.

Price Growth

CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while MTAGF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.57% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNTF($5.84B) has a higher market cap than MTAGF($1.46B). CDNTF has higher P/E ratio than MTAGF: CDNTF (65.00) vs MTAGF (11.22). CDNTF YTD gains are higher at: 42.407 vs. MTAGF (-13.178). CDNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. MTAGF (932M). MTAGF has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. CDNTF (464M). MTAGF has less debt than CDNTF: MTAGF (2.67B) vs CDNTF (8.82B). MTAGF has higher revenues than CDNTF: MTAGF (21.7B) vs CDNTF (16.7B).
CDNTFMTAGFCDNTF / MTAGF
Capitalization5.84B1.46B400%
EBITDA1.48B932M158%
Gain YTD42.407-13.178-322%
P/E Ratio65.0011.22579%
Revenue16.7B21.7B77%
Total Cash464M1.13B41%
Total Debt8.82B2.67B330%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNTF vs MTAGF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNTF
MTAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4548
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
5592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3775
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9835
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTAGF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (21). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MTAGF (100). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTAGF (92). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTAGF (75). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MTAGF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNTF (98). This means that MTAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIOIX12.870.04
+0.31%
M3Sixty Income and Opportunity Instl
SCSAX17.00N/A
N/A
Allspring Common Stock A
DSCYX31.89N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Small Cap Y
LCIAX205.04N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Index A (SIIT)
STESX15.59N/A
N/A
Bernstein International Strat Eqs SCB

CDNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNTF has been loosely correlated with MTPTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNTF jumps, then MTPTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNTF
1D Price
Change %
CDNTF100%
N/A
MTPTF - CDNTF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTAGF - CDNTF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANCTF - CDNTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
CMEIF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRM - CDNTF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More

MTAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTAGF and CDNTF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTAGF and CDNTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTAGF
1D Price
Change %
MTAGF100%
N/A
CDNTF - MTAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTRY - MTAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAHGF - MTAGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPTF - MTAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGFHY - MTAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More