CDOAF
Price
$5.50
Change
-$6.91 (-55.68%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
56.38M
OCG
Price
$6.28
Change
+$0.28 (+4.67%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
124.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDOAF vs OCG

Header iconCDOAF vs OCG Comparison
Open Charts CDOAF vs OCGBanner chart's image
CDON AB
Price$5.50
Change-$6.91 (-55.68%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization56.38M
Oriental Culture Holding
Price$6.28
Change+$0.28 (+4.67%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization124.4M
CDOAF vs OCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDOAF vs. OCG commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOAF is a Buy and OCG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CDOAF: $5.50 vs. OCG: $6.08)
Brand notoriety: CDOAF and OCG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDOAF: 100% vs. OCG: 3%
Market capitalization -- CDOAF: $56.38M vs. OCG: $124.4M
CDOAF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $56.38M. OCG’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $124.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $45.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDOAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCG is a better buy in the long-term than CDOAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OCG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CDOAF (@Internet Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCG (@Internet Retail) price change was +2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCG is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.54% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCG($124M) has a higher market cap than CDOAF($56.4M). OCG YTD gains are higher at: 394.626 vs. CDOAF (-55.681). OCG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.73M vs. CDOAF (-102.7M). CDOAF has more cash in the bank: 76.8M vs. OCG (18.2M). CDOAF has higher revenues than OCG: CDOAF (420M) vs OCG (1.58M).
CDOAFOCGCDOAF / OCG
Capitalization56.4M124M45%
EBITDA-102.7M-3.73M2,757%
Gain YTD-55.681394.626-14%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue420M1.58M26,582%
Total Cash76.8M18.2M422%
Total DebtN/A11.5K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDOAFOCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARAFF0.130.01
+12.57%
Arafura Resources NL
BKFKF46.68N/A
N/A
Bakkafrost PF
HOKCF0.84N/A
N/A
Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.
BDRPF9.25N/A
N/A
Bombardier Inc.
HFBA24.05-0.55
-2.24%
HFB Financial Corp.

CDOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDOAF and JWEL have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDOAF and JWEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDOAF
1D Price
Change %
CDOAF100%
N/A
JWEL - CDOAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
TDUP - CDOAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
OCG - CDOAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
GLBE - CDOAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
CPNG - CDOAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

OCG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OCG and CVNA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OCG and CVNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCG
1D Price
Change %
OCG100%
-2.81%
CVNA - OCG
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
VIPS - OCG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
ETSY - OCG
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
MI - OCG
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
HEPS - OCG
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
More