Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FSSNX
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FSSNX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$49.40
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.87M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. CDOFX (329M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: CDOFX (1.11) vs FSSNX (0.84). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOFX: FSSNX (0) vs CDOFX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. CDOFX (4.72). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 63.75 vs. CDOFX (47.12).
| CDOFX | FSSNX | CDOFX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 4,600% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.239 | 8.273 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329M | 27.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.84 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 16.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.57 | 33.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.12 | 63.75 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.28 | 103.63 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers