Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FSSNX
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FSSNX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$46.00
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.4M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FSSNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. CDOFX (319M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: CDOFX (1.07) vs FSSNX (0.80). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CDOFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOFX: FSSNX (0) vs CDOFX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. CDOFX (-9.13). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. CDOFX (21.76).
| CDOFX | FSSNX | CDOFX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.03 | 4,560% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.905 | 6.647 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 29B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.80 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.13 | 2.54 | -360% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.00 | 33.14 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.76 | 37.59 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.94 | 96.91 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement