Ad is loading...
CDOFX vs FSSNX
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FSSNX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$44.71
Change+$0.84 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.3M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.27
Change+$0.46 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.69B
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FSSNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. CDOFX (301M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: CDOFX (1.27) vs FSSNX (1.16). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOFX: FSSNX (0) vs CDOFX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.73 vs. CDOFX (-4.10). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.34 vs. CDOFX (43.38).
| CDOFX | FSSNX | CDOFX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 4,600% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.994 | -10.368 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 23.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.16 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.10 | -1.73 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.14 | 18.54 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.38 | 56.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.81 | 57.12 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers