Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FTHFX
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FTHFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$44.68
Change-$0.34 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.91M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.91
Change-$0.19 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FTHFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. CDOFX (308M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CDOFX (1.27) vs FTHFX (0.82). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CDOFX (22.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CDOFX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). CDOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.79 vs. FTHFX (-3.27). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.03 vs. CDOFX (48.88).
| CDOFX | FTHFX | CDOFX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.63 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.582 | -2.906 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 308M | 10B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.82 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.79 | -3.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.94 | 36.95 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.88 | 101.03 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.37 | 131.62 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement