Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FTHFX
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FTHFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$46.00
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.4M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CDOFX (319M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CDOFX (1.07) vs FTHFX (0.70). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CDOFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CDOFX (22.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CDOFX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. CDOFX (-9.13). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. CDOFX (21.76).
| CDOFX | FTHFX | CDOFX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.63 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.905 | 6.957 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 10.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.70 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.13 | -5.11 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.00 | 36.76 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.76 | 79.21 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.94 | 159.87 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement