Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FTHFX
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FTHFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$47.49
Change+$0.21 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.56M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.6B
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a StrongBuy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. CDOFX (315M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CDOFX (1.18) vs FTHFX (0.76). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CDOFX (22.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CDOFX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. CDOFX (-3.15). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.34 vs. CDOFX (42.12).
| CDOFX | FTHFX | CDOFX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.63 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.577 | 3.170 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 10.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.76 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.15 | 0.29 | -1,078% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.23 | 43.05 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.12 | 96.34 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.05 | 148.43 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement