Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FTHFX
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FTHFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$49.40
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.87M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. CDOFX (329M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CDOFX (1.11) vs FTHFX (0.70). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CDOFX (22.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CDOFX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. CDOFX (4.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 106.45 vs. CDOFX (47.12).
| CDOFX | FTHFX | CDOFX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.63 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.239 | 10.502 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329M | 11.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.70 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 9.94 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.57 | 50.75 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.12 | 106.45 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.28 | 179.22 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers