CDPYF
Price
$29.31
Change
-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
DBMBF
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CDPYF vs DBMBF

Header iconCDPYF vs DBMBF Comparison
Open Charts CDPYF vs DBMBFBanner chart's image
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$29.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Volume$62.87K
CapitalizationN/A
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$1.62
Change+$0.02 (+1.25%)
Volume$16.3K
CapitalizationN/A
CDPYF vs DBMBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDPYF vs. DBMBF commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDPYF is a Hold and DBMBF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (CDPYF: $29.31 vs. DBMBF: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: CDPYF and DBMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDPYF: 112% vs. DBMBF: 124%
Market capitalization -- CDPYF: $6.49B vs. DBMBF: $1.48B
CDPYF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $6.49B. DBMBF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDPYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDPYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DBMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CDPYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDPYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBMBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDPYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DBMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the short-term than CDPYF.

Price Growth

CDPYF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -6.27% price change this week, while DBMBF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.30% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDPYF($6.49B) has a higher market cap than DBMBF($1.48B). CDPYF has higher P/E ratio than DBMBF: CDPYF (666.67) vs DBMBF (12.47). DBMBF YTD gains are higher at: -14.205 vs. CDPYF (-20.795). DBMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. CDPYF (9.28M). DBMBF has more cash in the bank: 414M vs. CDPYF (26.6M). CDPYF has less debt than DBMBF: CDPYF (7.11B) vs DBMBF (16B). DBMBF has higher revenues than CDPYF: DBMBF (4.11B) vs CDPYF (1.02B).
CDPYFDBMBFCDPYF / DBMBF
Capitalization6.49B1.48B438%
EBITDA9.28M2.83B0%
Gain YTD-20.795-14.205146%
P/E Ratio666.6712.475,347%
Revenue1.02B4.11B25%
Total Cash26.6M414M6%
Total Debt7.11B16B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDPYF vs DBMBF: Fundamental Ratings
CDPYF
DBMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2396
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
8437
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBMBF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (57). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDPYF (100). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDPYF (84). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (80). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

CDPYF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBMBF (99). This means that CDPYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDPYFDBMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEMGX9.650.05
+0.52%
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity R6
GCVUX22.95N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R6
PQJCX14.62N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity R6
ENHNX10.13-0.05
-0.45%
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income I
TMAPX53.81-0.58
-1.07%
Touchstone Mid Cap A

CDPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDPYF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDPYF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDPYF
1D Price
Change %
CDPYF100%
-0.14%
RIOCF - CDPYF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
SPG - CDPYF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
IRT - CDPYF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
PGRE - CDPYF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
MAA - CDPYF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
More

DBMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMBF and GWWTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMBF and GWWTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMBF
1D Price
Change %
DBMBF100%
N/A
GWWTF - DBMBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - DBMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLOF - DBMBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
CROMF - DBMBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
CDPYF - DBMBF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More