Advertisement
CDRO vs LTRCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDRO is a Hold and LTRCF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LTRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDRO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTRCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDRO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LTRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CDRO (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while LTRCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDRO is expected to report earnings on Jun 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+0.98% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| CDRO | LTRCF | CDRO / LTRCF | |
| Capitalization | 316M | 7.75B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -65.77M | 599M | -11% |
| Gain YTD | 27.597 | 3.114 | 886% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.11 | - |
| Revenue | 80.3M | 3.28B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 98.8M | 542M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 2.98M | 2.49B | 0% |
| CDRO | LTRCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 30% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 20% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 23% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCG | 23.42 | 0.43 | +1.87% |
| First Trust Natural Gas ETF | |||
| AIFD | 31.37 | 0.39 | +1.24% |
| TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | |||
| BULZ | 190.08 | 2.27 | +1.21% |
| MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs | |||
| MSSS | 29.39 | 0.18 | +0.63% |
| Monarch Select Subsector ETF | |||
| DWSH | 7.06 | -0.09 | -1.25% |
| AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | |||
CDRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDRO has been loosely correlated with FLUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDRO jumps, then FLUT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDRO | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| FLUT - CDRO | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| MGM - CDRO | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| PENN - CDRO | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.87% | ||
| CZR - CDRO | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| BYD - CDRO | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||
LTRCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTRCF and GIGNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTRCF and GIGNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTRCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTRCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GIGNF - LTRCF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| SEGG - LTRCF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CDRO - LTRCF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| JPOTF - LTRCF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| AAPI - LTRCF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||