CDRO
Price
$8.11
Change
-$0.26 (-3.11%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
315.73M
LTRCF
Price
$3.35
Change
+$0.27 (+8.77%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDRO vs LTRCF

Header iconCDRO vs LTRCF Comparison
Open Charts CDRO vs LTRCFBanner chart's image
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
Price$8.11
Change-$0.26 (-3.11%)
Volume$29.56K
Capitalization315.73M
LOTTERY
Price$3.35
Change+$0.27 (+8.77%)
Volume$226
Capitalization7.75B
CDRO vs LTRCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDRO vs. LTRCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDRO is a StrongBuy and LTRCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CDRO: $8.11 vs. LTRCF: $3.35)
Brand notoriety: CDRO and LTRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDRO: 55% vs. LTRCF: 7%
Market capitalization -- CDRO: $315.73M vs. LTRCF: $7.75B
CDRO [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $315.73M. LTRCF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $7.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LTRCF is a better buy in the long-term than CDRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDRO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTRCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDRO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LTRCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LTRCF is a better buy in the short-term than CDRO.

Price Growth

CDRO (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while LTRCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.08% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTRCF($7.75B) has a higher market cap than CDRO($316M). CDRO YTD gains are higher at: 25.736 vs. LTRCF (3.114). LTRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 599M vs. CDRO (-65.77M). LTRCF has more cash in the bank: 542M vs. CDRO (98.8M). CDRO has less debt than LTRCF: CDRO (2.98M) vs LTRCF (2.49B). LTRCF has higher revenues than CDRO: LTRCF (3.28B) vs CDRO (80.3M).
CDROLTRCFCDRO / LTRCF
Capitalization316M7.75B4%
EBITDA-65.77M599M-11%
Gain YTD25.7363.114827%
P/E RatioN/A33.11-
Revenue80.3M3.28B2%
Total Cash98.8M542M18%
Total Debt2.98M2.49B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDROLTRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TKECF4.200.40
+10.53%
Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings
COGNY0.490.04
+7.95%
COGNA EDUCACAO S A
HKXCY54.730.10
+0.18%
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing Ltd.
ELCO42.25N/A
N/A
Elcom International, Inc.
HONT118.23N/A
N/A
Honat Bancorp, Inc.

CDRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDRO has been loosely correlated with FLUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDRO jumps, then FLUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDRO
1D Price
Change %
CDRO100%
-3.11%
FLUT - CDRO
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
MGM - CDRO
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
PENN - CDRO
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
EVRI - CDRO
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CZR - CDRO
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
More

LTRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTRCF and GIGNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTRCF and GIGNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRCF
1D Price
Change %
LTRCF100%
N/A
GIGNF - LTRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEGG - LTRCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.51%
CDRO - LTRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
JPOTF - LTRCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
AAPI - LTRCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More