CDRO
Price
$7.12
Change
-$0.23 (-3.13%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
LTRCF
Price
$3.25
Change
-$0.03 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

CDRO vs LTRCF

Header iconCDRO vs LTRCF Comparison
Open Charts CDRO vs LTRCFBanner chart's image
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
Price$7.12
Change-$0.23 (-3.13%)
Volume$32.57K
CapitalizationN/A
LOTTERY
Price$3.25
Change-$0.03 (-0.91%)
Volume$1.02K
CapitalizationN/A
CDRO vs LTRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDRO vs. LTRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDRO is a Hold and LTRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CDRO: $7.12 vs. LTRCF: $3.25)
Brand notoriety: CDRO and LTRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDRO: 47% vs. LTRCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CDRO: $315.73M vs. LTRCF: $7.75B
CDRO [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $315.73M. LTRCF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $7.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDRO and LTRCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDRO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CDRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CDRO (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while LTRCF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-3.16% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTRCF($7.75B) has a higher market cap than CDRO($316M). CDRO YTD gains are higher at: 150.000 vs. LTRCF (3.834). LTRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 599M vs. CDRO (-65.77M). LTRCF has more cash in the bank: 542M vs. CDRO (98.8M). CDRO has less debt than LTRCF: CDRO (2.98M) vs LTRCF (2.49B). LTRCF has higher revenues than CDRO: LTRCF (3.28B) vs CDRO (80.3M).
CDROLTRCFCDRO / LTRCF
Capitalization316M7.75B4%
EBITDA-65.77M599M-11%
Gain YTD150.0003.8343,913%
P/E RatioN/A33.11-
Revenue80.3M3.28B2%
Total Cash98.8M542M18%
Total Debt2.98M2.49B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDROLTRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGOTX8.40N/A
N/A
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth C
RAPAX10.07-0.05
-0.49%
Cohen & Steers Real Assets A
FSRNX16.90-0.10
-0.59%
Fidelity Real Estate Index
APGZX113.27-0.78
-0.68%
AB Large Cap Growth Z
TEPIX42.18-0.38
-0.89%
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Inv

CDRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDRO and LNW have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDRO and LNW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDRO
1D Price
Change %
CDRO100%
+0.82%
LNW - CDRO
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
EVRI - CDRO
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
GDEN - CDRO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
HGV - CDRO
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
RRR - CDRO
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

LTRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTRCF and GIGNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTRCF and GIGNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRCF
1D Price
Change %
LTRCF100%
N/A
GIGNF - LTRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRY - LTRCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-15.67%
CDRO - LTRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
JPOTF - LTRCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAPI - LTRCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More