Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFEX
CDVZX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFEX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.48
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
CDVZX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CDVZX (2.65B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMFEX (1.46) vs CDVZX (1.11). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CDVZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFEX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. CDVZX (6.03). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. CDVZX (53.90).
| CDVZX | RMFEX | CDVZX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.62 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | 15.028 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.46 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 8.45 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 44.96 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.90 | 61.73 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.10 | 101.65 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers