Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RWMHX
CDVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RWMHX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$67.39
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
CDVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. CDVZX (2.65B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RWMHX (1.33) vs CDVZX (1.11). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). CDVZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RWMHX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. CDVZX (6.03). RWMHX (53.96) and CDVZX (53.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDVZX | RWMHX | CDVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.41 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.41 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | 10.898 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 6.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 45.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.90 | 53.96 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement