Advertisement
CDW vs OMFL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDW is a Buy and OMFL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CDW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CDW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CDW (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.53% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (+2.87% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CDW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CDW | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 14 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSLZ | 0.73 | 0.05 | +6.83% |
| T-REX 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | |||
| QBTX | 318.49 | 14.73 | +4.85% |
| Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | |||
| BGT | 12.20 | 0.18 | +1.50% |
| BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | |||
| EAOM | 29.87 | 0.17 | +0.59% |
| iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Mod Allc ETF | |||
| HYDB | 47.50 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | |||
CDW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDW has been loosely correlated with ACN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDW jumps, then ACN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDW | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| ACN - CDW | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| FLYW - CDW | 56% Loosely correlated | -5.86% | ||
| CTSH - CDW | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| DXC - CDW | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| IT - CDW | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.35% | ||
More | ||||
OMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMFL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMFL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMFL | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| APH - OMFL | 86% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CDW - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| ACN - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| PAYX - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| AAPL - OMFL | 83% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||