Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWFX vs FNWFX
CDWFX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CDWFX vs FNWFX
CDWFX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWFX vs. FNWFX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWFX is a Hold and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CDWFX (2.73B). CDWFX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: CDWFX (1.86) vs FNWFX (1.24). CDWFX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: CDWFX (12 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). CDWFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). CDWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). CDWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: CDWFX (250) vs FNWFX (1000000). CDWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.03 vs. FNWFX (23.95). CDWFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.83 vs. FNWFX (16.26).
| CDWFX | FNWFX | CDWFX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.57 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.57 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.711 | 14.223 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.24 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.03 | 23.95 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.84 | 50.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.83 | 16.26 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers