Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDWFX vs RNWFX
CDWFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CDWFX vs RNWFX
CDWFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDWFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDWFX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. CDWFX (2.73B). CDWFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CDWFX (1.86) vs RNWFX (1.19). CDWFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CDWFX (12 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CDWFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CDWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). CDWFX (250) and RNWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CDWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.41 vs. RNWFX (21.36). CDWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.87 vs. RNWFX (18.33).
| CDWFX | RNWFX | CDWFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.110 | 14.186 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.19 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.41 | 21.36 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.70 | 51.55 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.87 | 18.33 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.79 | 118.37 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement