Ad is loading...
CDXFF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
MQ
Price
$3.93
Change
-$0.03 (-0.76%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
100 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CDXFF vs MQ

Header iconCDXFF vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts CDXFF vs MQBanner chart's image
Cloud DX
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16K
CapitalizationN/A
Marqeta
Price$3.93
Change-$0.03 (-0.76%)
Volume$9.62M
CapitalizationN/A
CDXFF vs MQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDXFF vs. MQ commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDXFF is a Hold and MQ is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CDXFF: $0.08 vs. MQ: $3.93)
Brand notoriety: CDXFF and MQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDXFF: 100% vs. MQ: 136%
Market capitalization -- CDXFF: $7.67M vs. MQ: $3.06B
CDXFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.67M. MQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDXFF is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CDXFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MQ (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($3.06B) has a higher market cap than CDXFF($7.68M). CDXFF YTD gains are higher at: 19.488 vs. MQ (-43.696). CDXFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.76M vs. MQ (-272.27M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. CDXFF (88.5K). CDXFF has less debt than MQ: CDXFF (9.41M) vs MQ (16.9M). MQ has higher revenues than CDXFF: MQ (676M) vs CDXFF (1.4M).
CDXFFMQCDXFF / MQ
Capitalization7.68M3.06B0%
EBITDA-8.76M-272.27M3%
Gain YTD19.488-43.696-45%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.4M676M0%
Total Cash88.5K1.25B0%
Total Debt9.41M16.9M56%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIRFX71.81-0.32
-0.44%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F
PYVSX19.40-0.09
-0.46%
Payden Equity Income SI
FTVFX39.52-0.19
-0.48%
Fidelity Advisor Value M
GSPAX17.89-0.19
-1.05%
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium A
AFGGX18.77-0.26
-1.37%
Yorktown Growth A

CDXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDXFF has been loosely correlated with SMSZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDXFF jumps, then SMSZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDXFF
1D Price
Change %
CDXFF100%
N/A
SMSZF - CDXFF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MNDY - CDXFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
AKAM - CDXFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
MQ - CDXFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
FLYW - CDXFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More