Advertisement
CE vs CGIFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CE is a Hold and CGIFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGIFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CGIFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGIFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CGIFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
CE is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
| CE | CGIFF | CE / CGIFF | |
| Capitalization | 5.26B | 926M | 568% |
| EBITDA | 308M | 436M | 71% |
| Gain YTD | -30.450 | 7.275 | -419% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.96 | 10.22 | 68% |
| Revenue | 10.1B | 1.84B | 550% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 28.9M | - |
| Total Debt | 13.1B | 990M | 1,323% |
CE | CGIFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGIFF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CE (59) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CE’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CE (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CGIFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CE’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CE (96) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CE’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CE (65) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CGIFF’s stock grew similarly to CE’s over the last 12 months.
CGIFF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CE (70) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that CGIFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CE’s over the last 12 months.
| CE | CGIFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 65% | 13 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 11 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FVLAX | 20.14 | 0.21 | +1.05% |
| Fidelity Advisor Value Leaders A | |||
| JDNAX | 76.97 | 0.52 | +0.68% |
| Janus Henderson Growth And Income A | |||
| EQNTX | 22.70 | 0.15 | +0.67% |
| MFS Equity Income R3 | |||
| FTSAX | 37.67 | 0.10 | +0.27% |
| FullerThaler Behvrl S-M Cor Eq A | |||
| FSTLX | 33.91 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R6 | |||
CGIFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGIFF has been loosely correlated with ECVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGIFF jumps, then ECVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGIFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGIFF | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| ECVT - CGIFF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CE - CGIFF | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| HWKN - CGIFF | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
| PRM - CGIFF | 33% Poorly correlated | +6.76% | ||
| AVNT - CGIFF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||