CE
Price
$51.71
Change
+$3.26 (+6.73%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
19.17B
82 days until earnings call
FUL
Price
$54.79
Change
+$1.70 (+3.20%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CE vs FUL

Header iconCE vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts CE vs FULBanner chart's image
Celanese
Price$51.71
Change+$3.26 (+6.73%)
Volume$2.97M
Capitalization19.17B
HB Fuller
Price$54.79
Change+$1.70 (+3.20%)
Volume$318.68K
Capitalization4.35B
CE vs FUL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CE vs. FUL commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CE is a StrongBuy and FUL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CE: $51.71 vs. FUL: $54.79)
Brand notoriety: CE and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CE: 79% vs. FUL: 56%
Market capitalization -- CE: $19.17B vs. FUL: $4.35B
CE [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $19.17B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than CE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than CE.

Price Growth

CE (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +13.90% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.79% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CE($19.2B) has a higher market cap than FUL($4.35B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than CE: FUL (28.70) vs CE (9.51). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -18.154 vs. CE (-25.191). CE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.64B vs. FUL (540M). CE has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than CE: FUL (1.83B) vs CE (14.1B). CE has higher revenues than FUL: CE (10.9B) vs FUL (3.51B).
CEFULCE / FUL
Capitalization19.2B4.35B442%
EBITDA2.64B540M489%
Gain YTD-25.191-18.154139%
P/E Ratio9.5128.7033%
Revenue10.9B3.51B310%
Total Cash1.81B165M1,094%
Total Debt14.1B1.83B770%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CE vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
CE
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1854
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
9279
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6455
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CE (93) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CE’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CE (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CE’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (79) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CE (92) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CE’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CE (63) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CE’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CE (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNGZ31.290.26
+0.83%
FirstTrust S&P500 DvrsDiv AristocratsETF
NULV39.590.19
+0.48%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
MVPS23.59N/A
N/A
Amplify Thematic All-Stars ETF
FBY15.68-0.02
-0.13%
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF
THW10.52-0.10
-0.94%
abrdn World Healthcare Fund

CE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CE has been closely correlated with HUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CE jumps, then HUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CE
1D Price
Change %
CE100%
+6.73%
HUN - CE
68%
Closely correlated
+7.23%
DOW - CE
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
OLN - CE
62%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
LYB - CE
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
HDSN - CE
58%
Loosely correlated
+16.24%
More

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+3.20%
RPM - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
KWR - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
+4.61%
SCL - FUL
66%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
LIN - FUL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
PPG - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More