Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWBX
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWBX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$15.30
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.58M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.59
Change+$0.63 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. CEFAX (120M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEFAX (1.21) vs RNWBX (0.12). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWBX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.17 vs. RNWBX (13.31). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. RNWBX (24.94).
| CEFAX | RNWBX | CEFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.286 | 24.528 | 132% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.12 | 1,003% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.17 | 13.31 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.99 | 55.50 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.85 | 24.94 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers