Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWBX
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWBX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$14.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.39M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.18
Change-$0.22 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. CEFAX (111M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEFAX (1.30) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWBX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.25 vs. RNWBX (14.13). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.41 vs. RNWBX (20.62).
| CEFAX | RNWBX | CEFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.607 | 15.812 | 156% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.13 | 1,005% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.25 | 14.13 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 27.48 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.41 | 20.62 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement