Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWBX
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWBX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$13.50
Change+$0.09 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.7M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.22
Change+$0.87 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. CEFAX (109M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEFAX (1.41) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWBX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.07 vs. RNWBX (10.04). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.58 vs. RNWBX (30.16).
| CEFAX | RNWBX | CEFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.016 | 14.507 | 117% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.13 | 1,048% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.07 | 10.04 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.79 | 32.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.58 | 30.16 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement