Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWBX
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWBX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$13.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.47M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
CEFAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. CEFAX (114M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEFAX (1.33) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWBX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.05 vs. RNWBX (8.48). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.81 vs. RNWBX (24.16).
| CEFAX | RNWBX | CEFAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.768 | 15.337 | 135% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.13 | 1,041% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.05 | 8.48 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.60 | 38.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.81 | 24.16 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement