Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWFX
CEFAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWFX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$13.50
Change+$0.09 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.7M
American Funds New World R5
Price$88.91
Change+$0.91 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
CEFAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. CEFAX (109M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEFAX (1.41) vs RNWFX (1.09). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEFAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWFX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.07 vs. RNWFX (11.33). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.58 vs. RNWFX (35.80).
| CEFAX | RNWFX | CEFAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.016 | 15.079 | 113% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.09 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.07 | 11.33 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.79 | 35.71 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.58 | 35.80 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers