Ad is loading...
CEFC
Price
$9.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
TBBA
Price
$6.64
Change
+$0.54 (+8.85%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CEFC vs TBBA

Header iconCEFC vs TBBA Comparison
Open Charts CEFC vs TBBABanner chart's image
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$9.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
TEB Ban
Price$6.64
Change+$0.54 (+8.85%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
CEFC vs TBBA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEFC vs. TBBA commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFC is a Hold and TBBA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CEFC: $9.73 vs. TBBA: $6.64)
Brand notoriety: CEFC and TBBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEFC: 5% vs. TBBA: 56%
Market capitalization -- CEFC: $25.88M vs. TBBA: $18.24M
CEFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.88M. TBBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBBA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than TBBA.

Price Growth

CEFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while TBBA (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEFC($25.9M) has a higher market cap than TBBA($18.2M). CEFC YTD gains are higher at: 10.104 vs. TBBA (-12.625). TBBA has less debt than CEFC: TBBA (5M) vs CEFC (39.8M). TBBA has higher revenues than CEFC: TBBA (18.5M) vs CEFC (11.5M).
CEFCTBBACEFC / TBBA
Capitalization25.9M18.2M142%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.104-12.625-80%
P/E RatioN/A4.47-
Revenue11.5M18.5M62%
Total Cash6.29MN/A-
Total Debt39.8M5M796%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEFC: Fundamental Ratings
CEFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTZG32.94N/A
N/A
NuShares ETF Trust Nuveen Global Net Zero Transition ETF
HOMZ48.74-0.17
-0.35%
The Hoya Capital Housing ETF
ITB117.72-1.20
-1.01%
iShares US Home Construction ETF
GSPY32.25-0.42
-1.30%
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
IPO44.31-0.98
-2.16%
Renaissance IPO ETF

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and EQGPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and EQGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
N/A
EQGPF - CEFC
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
MCBK - CEFC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPERF - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBBA and CMGGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBBA and CMGGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBBA
1D Price
Change %
TBBA100%
+8.91%
CMGGF - TBBA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEFC - TBBA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPBK - TBBA
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
EBC - TBBA
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
TRBK - TBBA
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More