CEFC
Price
$10.65
Change
+$0.30 (+2.90%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.88M
TBBA
Price
$6.50
Change
+$0.45 (+7.44%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
18.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEFC vs TBBA

Header iconCEFC vs TBBA Comparison
Open Charts CEFC vs TBBABanner chart's image
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$10.65
Change+$0.30 (+2.90%)
Volume$6.46K
Capitalization25.88M
TEB Ban
Price$6.50
Change+$0.45 (+7.44%)
Volume$700
Capitalization18.24M
CEFC vs TBBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEFC vs. TBBA commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFC is a StrongBuy and TBBA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CEFC: $10.65 vs. TBBA: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: CEFC and TBBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEFC: 753% vs. TBBA: 24%
Market capitalization -- CEFC: $25.88M vs. TBBA: $18.24M
CEFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.88M. TBBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTBBA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TBBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than TBBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBBA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TBBA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the short-term than TBBA.

Price Growth

CEFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while TBBA (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEFC($25.9M) has a higher market cap than TBBA($18.2M). CEFC YTD gains are higher at: 11.080 vs. TBBA (-2.695). TBBA has less debt than CEFC: TBBA (5M) vs CEFC (39.8M). TBBA has higher revenues than CEFC: TBBA (18.5M) vs CEFC (11.5M).
CEFCTBBACEFC / TBBA
Capitalization25.9M18.2M142%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.080-2.695-411%
P/E RatioN/A4.47-
Revenue11.5M18.5M62%
Total Cash6.29MN/A-
Total Debt39.8M5M796%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEFC vs TBBA: Fundamental Ratings
CEFC
TBBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
285
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
5456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBBA's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CEFC (24). This means that TBBA’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBBA (100). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBBA’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TBBA (56). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to TBBA’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TBBA (55). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to TBBA’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBBA (62). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBBA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEFCTBBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDGLY25.100.48
+1.95%
Comfortdelgro Corp., Ltd.
KIKOY17.50N/A
N/A
Kikkoman Corp.
AIJTY2.50N/A
N/A
Jianpu Technology Inc.
PBEGF0.17N/A
-0.91%
Touchstone Exploration Inc.
STRFF0.17N/A
-2.53%
Star Royalties Ltd.

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and EQGPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and EQGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
+2.90%
EQGPF - CEFC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCBK - CEFC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPERF - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBBA and CMGGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBBA and CMGGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBBA
1D Price
Change %
TBBA100%
N/A
CMGGF - TBBA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEFC - TBBA
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
OPBK - TBBA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
EBC - TBBA
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
WTBFB - TBBA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More