Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFIX vs RNWBX
CEFIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEFIX vs RNWBX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement I
Price$13.99
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.47M
American Funds New World R2
Price$83.92
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.4B
CEFIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFIX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.4B vs. CEFIX (114M). CEFIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEFIX (1.45) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEFIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEFIX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEFIX (1.17). CEFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFIX: RNWBX (250) vs CEFIX (1000000). CEFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.48 vs. RNWBX (10.68). CEFIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.07 vs. RNWBX (21.01).
| CEFIX | RNWBX | CEFIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.67 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.67 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.664 | 14.099 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 69.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.13 | 1,126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.48 | 10.68 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.91 | 30.02 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.07 | 21.01 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement