Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFIX vs RNWBX
CEFIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEFIX vs RNWBX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement I
Price$14.82
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.67M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.16
Change+$0.16 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
CEFIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFIX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. CEFIX (117M). CEFIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEFIX (1.42) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEFIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEFIX (6 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEFIX (1.17). CEFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFIX: RNWBX (250) vs CEFIX (1000000). CEFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.25 vs. RNWBX (15.57). CEFIX return over 5 years is better than : 55.57 vs. RNWBX (25.99).
| CEFIX | RNWBX | CEFIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.67 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.67 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.423 | 21.224 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 73B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.13 | 1,133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.25 | 15.57 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 42.56 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.57 | 25.99 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers