Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFIX vs RNWHX
CEFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEFIX vs RNWHX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement I
Price$13.99
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.47M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.22
Change-$0.56 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.4B
CEFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.4B vs. CEFIX (114M). CEFIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEFIX (1.45) vs RNWHX (1.00). CEFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEFIX (6 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CEFIX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFIX: RNWHX (250) vs CEFIX (1000000). CEFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.48 vs. RNWHX (11.85). CEFIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.07 vs. RNWHX (25.64).
| CEFIX | RNWHX | CEFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.72 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.72 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.664 | 14.733 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 69.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.00 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.48 | 11.85 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.91 | 32.64 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.07 | 25.64 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement