CEIEF vs VTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEIEF is a Hold and VTS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CEIEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVTS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CEIEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VTS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CEIEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CEIEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- VTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CEIEF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -8.86% price change this week, while VTS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +46.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
VTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+46.66% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| CEIEF | VTS | CEIEF / VTS | |
| Capitalization | 273M | 699M | 39% |
| EBITDA | -9.63M | 129M | -7% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 30.164 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.35 | - |
| Revenue | 7.1M | 234M | 3% |
| Total Cash | 54M | 552K | 9,783% |
| Total Debt | 1.53M | 84.3M | 2% |
| CEIEF | VTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 77% |
CEIEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CEIEF and TXO have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEIEF and TXO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CEIEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEIEF | 100% | -2.74% | ||
| TXO - CEIEF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
| KWTEF - CEIEF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRNT - CEIEF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
| VTS - CEIEF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CECAF - CEIEF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
VTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTS has been closely correlated with CIVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTS jumps, then CIVI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTS | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| CIVI - VTS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| NOG - VTS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| MTDR - VTS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CHRD - VTS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| PR - VTS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||