Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEKRX vs RNWFX
CEKRX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEKRX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2
Price$16.86
Change+$0.17 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.63M
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.43
Change+$0.60 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
CEKRX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEKRX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEKRX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. CEKRX (769M). CEKRX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEKRX (1.16) vs RNWFX (1.01). CEKRX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEKRX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEKRX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). CEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: CEKRX (0) vs RNWFX (250). CEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.13 vs. RNWFX (17.49). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.46 vs. CEKRX (7.62).
| CEKRX | RNWFX | CEKRX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.489 | 23.518 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 769M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.01 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.13 | 17.49 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.05 | 50.22 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.62 | 31.46 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.08 | 98.85 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement