Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWBX
CEMFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$14.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
CEMFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. CEMFX (1.3B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMFX (2.91) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMFX (1.22). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. RNWBX (8.48). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 82.88 vs. RNWBX (24.16).
| CEMFX | RNWBX | CEMFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.109 | 15.337 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 70.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 0.13 | 2,273% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.34 | 8.48 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.57 | 38.04 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.88 | 24.16 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.89 | 59.88 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement