Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWBX
CEMFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$13.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
CEMFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. CEMFX (1.12B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMFX (3.25) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMFX (1.22). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. RNWBX (6.57). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 75.76 vs. RNWBX (25.37).
| CEMFX | RNWBX | CEMFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.67 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.439 | 11.407 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 67.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 0.13 | 2,416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 6.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | 21.12 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.76 | 25.37 | 299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.21 | 55.86 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers