Advertisement
CENT vs SMPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CENT is a Hold and SMPL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CENT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CENT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CENT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CENT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CENT (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
CENT is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.
SMPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.85% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CENT | SMPL | CENT / SMPL | |
| Capitalization | 2.69B | 3.4B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 319M | 234M | 136% |
| Gain YTD | 2.113 | -22.986 | -9% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.91 | 26.07 | 80% |
| Revenue | 3.32B | 1.25B | 265% |
| Total Cash | 341M | 121M | 282% |
| Total Debt | 1.38B | 272M | 506% |
CENT | SMPL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CENT's Valuation (81) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as SMPL (89) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
CENT's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as SMPL (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
CENT's SMR Rating (76) in the Consumer Sundries industry is in the same range as SMPL (76) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
CENT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (80) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
CENT's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (62) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
| CENT | SMPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 12 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
CENT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENT has been closely correlated with CENTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CENT jumps, then CENTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CENT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| CENTA - CENT | 97% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| SMPL - CENT | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| FLO - CENT | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| USNA - CENT | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| KHC - CENT | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
SMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPL | 100% | -2.09% | ||
| FLO - SMPL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| KHC - SMPL | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| MKC - SMPL | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| JJSF - SMPL | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| GIS - SMPL | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||