CERGF
Price
$4.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
55.14M
HFFG
Price
$2.86
Change
+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
182.55M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CERGF vs HFFG

Header iconCERGF vs HFFG Comparison
Open Charts CERGF vs HFFGBanner chart's image
Ceres Global Ag
Price$4.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization55.14M
HF Foods Group
Price$2.86
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
Volume$300
Capitalization182.55M
CERGF vs HFFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CERGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CERGF vs. HFFG commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CERGF is a Hold and HFFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CERGF: $4.46 vs. HFFG: $2.85)
Brand notoriety: CERGF and HFFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CERGF: 11% vs. HFFG: 63%
Market capitalization -- CERGF: $55.14M vs. HFFG: $182.55M
CERGF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $55.14M. HFFG’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $182.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CERGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHFFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CERGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HFFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CERGF is a better buy in the long-term than HFFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CERGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CERGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HFFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CERGF is a better buy in the short-term than HFFG.

Price Growth

CERGF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HFFG (@Food Distributors) price change was +3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFFG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.27% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFFG($183M) has a higher market cap than CERGF($55.1M). HFFG has higher P/E ratio than CERGF: HFFG (357.14) vs CERGF (3.05). CERGF YTD gains are higher at: 108.411 vs. HFFG (-11.215). HFFG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.8M vs. CERGF (-13.91M). HFFG has more cash in the bank: 15.2M vs. CERGF (7.12M). CERGF has less debt than HFFG: CERGF (66.9M) vs HFFG (203M). HFFG (1.15B) and CERGF (1.11B) have equivalent revenues.
CERGFHFFGCERGF / HFFG
Capitalization55.1M183M30%
EBITDA-13.91M34.8M-40%
Gain YTD108.411-11.215-967%
P/E Ratio3.05357.141%
Revenue1.11B1.15B97%
Total Cash7.12M15.2M47%
Total Debt66.9M203M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CERGF vs HFFG: Fundamental Ratings
CERGF
HFFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3856
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
8995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
276
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CERGF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HFFG (59) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CERGF’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

CERGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFFG (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CERGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

CERGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HFFG (95) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CERGF’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

CERGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HFFG (63) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CERGF’s stock grew similarly to HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

CERGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFFG (76) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CERGF’s stock grew significantly faster than HFFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CERGFHFFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CERGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL213.2510.33
+5.09%
Apple
TSLA319.9111.19
+3.62%
Tesla
BTC.X115028.000000886.562500
+0.78%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY632.784.81
+0.77%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME22.81N/A
N/A
GameStop Corp

CERGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CERGF and MCSHF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CERGF and MCSHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CERGF
1D Price
Change %
CERGF100%
N/A
MCSHF - CERGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - CERGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
HFFG - CERGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
MCLE - CERGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVO - CERGF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

HFFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFFG and PFGC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFFG and PFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFFG
1D Price
Change %
HFFG100%
-1.72%
PFGC - HFFG
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
USFD - HFFG
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
ANDE - HFFG
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
SPTN - HFFG
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
CVGW - HFFG
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More