It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CERS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CERS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INMD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CERS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.76% price change this week, while INMD (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.61%.
CERS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
INMD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| CERS | INMD | CERS / INMD | |
| Capitalization | 513M | 853M | 60% |
| EBITDA | 475K | 80.5M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 24.272 | -8.305 | -292% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 9.98 | - |
| Revenue | 217M | 375M | 58% |
| Total Cash | 80.4M | 537M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 97.4M | 4.83M | 2,017% |
CERS | INMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CERS's Valuation (32) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as INMD (55) in the null industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to INMD’s over the last 12 months.
CERS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as INMD (100) in the null industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to INMD’s over the last 12 months.
INMD's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CERS (96) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that INMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CERS’s over the last 12 months.
CERS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as INMD (58) in the null industry. This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to INMD’s over the last 12 months.
INMD's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CERS (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that INMD’s stock grew significantly faster than CERS’s over the last 12 months.
| CERS | INMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | 29 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CERS has been loosely correlated with ICUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CERS jumps, then ICUI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CERS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERS | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| ICUI - CERS | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| UTMD - CERS | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| BLFS - CERS | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| RVTY - CERS | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| ATRC - CERS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INMD has been loosely correlated with UTMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INMD jumps, then UTMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INMD | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| UTMD - INMD | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| RVTY - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| CRL - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| MTD - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| AZTA - INMD | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
More | ||||