CERS
Price
$2.46
Change
-$0.06 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
504.93M
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEOG
Price
$9.47
Change
+$0.17 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 16, 12:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.02B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CERS vs NEOG

Header iconCERS vs NEOG Comparison
Open Charts CERS vs NEOGBanner chart's image
CERS vs NEOG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CERS vs. NEOG commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CERS is a Buy and NEOG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CERS: $2.52 vs. NEOG: $9.30)
Brand notoriety: CERS and NEOG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CERS: 83% vs. NEOG: 51%
Market capitalization -- CERS: $504.93M vs. NEOG: $2.02B
CERS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $504.93M. NEOG’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $2.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $154.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CERS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNEOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CERS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NEOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CERS and NEOG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CERS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEOG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CERS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEOG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEOG is a better buy in the short-term than CERS.

Price Growth

CERS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.08% price change this week, while NEOG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

CERS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

NEOG is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.68% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEOG($2.02B) has a higher market cap than CERS($505M). NEOG YTD gains are higher at: 33.047 vs. CERS (22.330). CERS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 475K vs. NEOG (-441.42M). NEOG has more cash in the bank: 160M vs. CERS (80.4M). CERS has less debt than NEOG: CERS (97.4M) vs NEOG (793M). NEOG has higher revenues than CERS: NEOG (871M) vs CERS (217M).
CERSNEOGCERS / NEOG
Capitalization505M2.02B25%
EBITDA475K-441.42M-0%
Gain YTD22.33033.04768%
P/E RatioN/A865.00-
Revenue217M871M25%
Total Cash80.4M160M50%
Total Debt97.4M793M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CERS vs NEOG: Fundamental Ratings
CERS
NEOG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CERS's Valuation (32) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEOG (97). This means that CERS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEOG’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as NEOG (100). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to NEOG’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's SMR Rating (96) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as NEOG (98). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to NEOG’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as NEOG (43). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to NEOG’s over the last 12 months.

NEOG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CERS (100). This means that NEOG’s stock grew significantly faster than CERS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CERSNEOG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CERS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEOG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRXG39.410.98
+2.55%
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF
MCR6.030.02
+0.33%
MFS Charter Income Trust
FSIG18.940.01
+0.05%
First Trust Ltd Drtn Inv Grd Corp ETF
AUGZ45.01N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF
DVXE36.29-1.53
-4.05%
WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF

CERS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CERS has been loosely correlated with ICUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CERS jumps, then ICUI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CERS
1D Price
Change %
CERS100%
-1.56%
ICUI - CERS
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
UTMD - CERS
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
BLFS - CERS
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
RVTY - CERS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
ATRC - CERS
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.81%
More