CESDF
Price
$4.79
Change
-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
536.01M
FTI
Price
$34.05
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.98B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs FTI

Header iconCESDF vs FTI Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs FTIBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$4.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Volume$237
Capitalization536.01M
TechnipFMC
Price$34.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$38.31K
Capitalization10.98B
CESDF vs FTI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. FTI commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Hold and FTI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $4.79 vs. FTI: $34.05)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and FTI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 5% vs. FTI: 135%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. FTI: $10.98B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. FTI’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $10.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTI is a better buy in the long-term than CESDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -5.58% price change this week, while FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CESDF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

FTI is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-2.74% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTI($11B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($536M). FTI has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: FTI (212.42) vs CESDF (6.26). FTI YTD gains are higher at: 18.055 vs. CESDF (-30.479). FTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 707M vs. CESDF (266M). FTI has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. CESDF (0). CESDF has less debt than FTI: CESDF (513M) vs FTI (1.97B). FTI has higher revenues than CESDF: FTI (7.82B) vs CESDF (2.08B).
CESDFFTICESDF / FTI
Capitalization536M11B5%
EBITDA266M707M38%
Gain YTD-30.47918.055-169%
P/E Ratio6.26212.423%
Revenue2.08B7.82B27%
Total Cash0962M-
Total Debt513M1.97B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs FTI: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
FTI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
328
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (50). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (32). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (100). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (60). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (98). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGTX0.300.04
+15.61%
Cognition Therapeutics
JOBY8.830.32
+3.76%
Joby Aviation
DXLG1.060.01
+0.95%
Destination XL Group
AWK142.18-1.81
-1.26%
American Water Works Company
HPP2.72-0.08
-2.86%
Hudson Pacific Properties

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-0.27%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
More