CESDF
Price
$4.98
Change
-$0.20 (-3.86%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
536.01M
FTI
Price
$35.49
Change
-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.98B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs FTI

Header iconCESDF vs FTI Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs FTIBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$4.98
Change-$0.20 (-3.86%)
Volume$283
Capitalization536.01M
TechnipFMC
Price$35.49
Change-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Volume$2.93M
Capitalization10.98B
CESDF vs FTI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. FTI commentary
Aug 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a StrongBuy and FTI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $4.98 vs. FTI: $35.49)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and FTI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 4% vs. FTI: 69%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. FTI: $10.98B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. FTI’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $10.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FTI is a better buy in the long-term than CESDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTI is a better buy in the short-term than CESDF.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -8.37% price change this week, while FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -5.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CESDF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

FTI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-2.67% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTI($11B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($536M). FTI has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: FTI (212.42) vs CESDF (6.26). FTI YTD gains are higher at: 23.048 vs. CESDF (-27.721). FTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 707M vs. CESDF (266M). FTI has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. CESDF (0). CESDF has less debt than FTI: CESDF (513M) vs FTI (1.97B). FTI has higher revenues than CESDF: FTI (7.82B) vs CESDF (2.08B).
CESDFFTICESDF / FTI
Capitalization536M11B5%
EBITDA266M707M38%
Gain YTD-27.72123.048-120%
P/E Ratio6.26212.423%
Revenue2.08B7.82B27%
Total Cash0962M-
Total Debt513M1.97B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs FTI: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
FTI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8171
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
318
SMR RATING
1..100
4033
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6585
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTI (70). This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTI’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (31). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (40). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (57). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (85). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFFTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EURCHF0.93N/A
N/A
Euro - Switzerland Franc
LIDRX9.60N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value R2
USDJPY146.790.01
N/A
United States Dollar - Japan Yen
JPYCNY0.05N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - China Yuan
HFAFX15.56N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val R5

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-3.83%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
More

FTI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been closely correlated with OII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then OII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTI
1D Price
Change %
FTI100%
-0.56%
OII - FTI
80%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
BKR - FTI
74%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
CHX - FTI
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
HAL - FTI
71%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
SLB - FTI
71%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
More