Ad is loading...
CESDF
Price
$6.37
Change
-$0.10 (-1.55%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FTI
Price
$28.18
Change
-$0.31 (-1.09%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CESDF vs FTI

Header iconCESDF vs FTI Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs FTIBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$6.37
Change-$0.10 (-1.55%)
Volume$4.53K
CapitalizationN/A
TechnipFMC
Price$28.18
Change-$0.31 (-1.09%)
Volume$3.51M
CapitalizationN/A
CESDF vs FTI Comparison Chart
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. FTI commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a StrongBuy and FTI is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CESDF: $6.36 vs. FTI: $28.18)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and FTI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 50% vs. FTI: 93%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. FTI: $10.98B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. FTI’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $10.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than FTI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than FTI.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTI is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTI($11B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($536M). FTI has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: FTI (212.42) vs CESDF (6.26). CESDF YTD gains are higher at: 144.582 vs. FTI (40.733). FTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 707M vs. CESDF (266M). FTI has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. CESDF (0). CESDF has less debt than FTI: CESDF (513M) vs FTI (1.97B). FTI has higher revenues than CESDF: FTI (7.82B) vs CESDF (2.08B).
CESDFFTICESDF / FTI
Capitalization536M11B5%
EBITDA266M707M38%
Gain YTD144.58240.733355%
P/E Ratio6.26212.423%
Revenue2.08B7.82B27%
Total Cash0962M-
Total Debt513M1.97B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs FTI: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
FTI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5031
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
437
SMR RATING
1..100
3644
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (61). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTI (37). This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTI’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (44). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (45). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTI (100). This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFFTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGBH24.390.03
+0.14%
iShares Interest Rate Hdg L/T Corp BdETF
DFSE33.29-0.03
-0.08%
Dimensional Emerging Mrkts Sstby Cr 1ETF
ZHDG20.83-0.23
-1.08%
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
SMMD69.94-0.91
-1.28%
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
IWM228.48-3.46
-1.49%
iShares Russell 2000 ETF

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-1.47%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
More

FTI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been closely correlated with OII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then OII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTI
1D Price
Change %
FTI100%
-1.09%
OII - FTI
77%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
WFRD - FTI
69%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
HAL - FTI
68%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
NOV - FTI
66%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
BKR - FTI
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More