CESDF
Price
$6.21
Change
+$0.07 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
NOV
Price
$12.89
Change
-$0.42 (-3.16%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.79B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs NOV

Header iconCESDF vs NOV Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs NOVBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$6.21
Change+$0.07 (+1.14%)
Volume$58.28K
Capitalization1.36B
NOV
Price$12.89
Change-$0.42 (-3.16%)
Volume$2.94M
Capitalization4.79B
CESDF vs NOV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. NOV commentary
Sep 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Buy and NOV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $6.21 vs. NOV: $12.89)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and NOV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 21% vs. NOV: 81%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $1.36B vs. NOV: $4.79B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.36B. NOV’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than NOV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than NOV.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.01% price change this week, while NOV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.78% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOV($4.79B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($1.36B). CESDF (10.76) and NOV (10.65) have similar P/E ratio . NOV YTD gains are higher at: -8.631 vs. CESDF (-9.906). NOV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.05B vs. CESDF (370M). CESDF has less debt than NOV: CESDF (471M) vs NOV (2.37B). NOV has higher revenues than CESDF: NOV (8.79B) vs CESDF (2.42B).
CESDFNOVCESDF / NOV
Capitalization1.36B4.79B28%
EBITDA370M1.05B35%
Gain YTD-9.906-8.631115%
P/E Ratio10.7610.65101%
Revenue2.42B8.79B28%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt471M2.37B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs NOV: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
NOV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2591
SMR RATING
1..100
4079
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOV's Valuation (24) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CESDF (39) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOV (91) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOV (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

NOV's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CESDF (33) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFNOV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIRDX8.67-0.01
-0.12%
iShares Developed Real Estate Idx Instl
FCIHX17.33-0.04
-0.23%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
GQETX35.47-0.14
-0.39%
GMO Quality III
KNGAX11.77-0.07
-0.59%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc A
PKSCX37.93-0.59
-1.53%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core C

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
+1.03%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
More

NOV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOV has been closely correlated with FTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOV jumps, then FTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOV
1D Price
Change %
NOV100%
-2.61%
FTI - NOV
81%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
HAL - NOV
68%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
RES - NOV
67%
Closely correlated
-3.87%
OII - NOV
66%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
SLB - NOV
66%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
More