CESDF
Price
$6.53
Change
-$0.14 (-2.10%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
WFRD
Price
$69.71
Change
-$1.91 (-2.67%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:36 PM (EDT)
49 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CESDF vs WFRD

Header iconCESDF vs WFRD Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs WFRDBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$6.53
Change-$0.14 (-2.10%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
Weatherford International
Price$69.71
Change-$1.91 (-2.67%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CESDF vs WFRD Comparison Chart
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. WFRD commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Hold and WFRD is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CESDF: $6.53 vs. WFRD: $71.62)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and WFRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 53% vs. WFRD: 118%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. WFRD: $8.55B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. WFRD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $8.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFRD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than WFRD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFRD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFRD is a better buy in the short-term than CESDF.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -2.53% price change this week, while WFRD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFRD is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.57% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRD($8.55B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($536M). WFRD has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: WFRD (20.90) vs CESDF (6.26). CESDF YTD gains are higher at: 151.037 vs. WFRD (-26.396). WFRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. CESDF (266M). WFRD has more cash in the bank: 958M vs. CESDF (0). CESDF has less debt than WFRD: CESDF (513M) vs WFRD (2.06B). WFRD has higher revenues than CESDF: WFRD (5.14B) vs CESDF (2.08B).
CESDFWFRDCESDF / WFRD
Capitalization536M8.55B6%
EBITDA266M1.02B26%
Gain YTD151.037-26.396-572%
P/E Ratio6.2620.9030%
Revenue2.08B5.14B40%
Total Cash0958M-
Total Debt513M2.06B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFWFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHRRF0.16N/A
+0.62%
PharmaTher Holdings Ltd.
MTUAF342.252.00
+0.59%
MTU Aero Engines AG
HEINY36.55-0.19
-0.52%
Heineken N.V.
SMGZY22.39-0.27
-1.19%
Smiths Group Plc
IPOOF1.11-0.03
-2.25%
InPlay Oil Corp.

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-2.05%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
More

WFRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFRD has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFRD jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRD
1D Price
Change %
WFRD100%
-2.87%
SLB - WFRD
69%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
FTI - WFRD
67%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
NOV - WFRD
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
CHX - WFRD
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
TDW - WFRD
64%
Loosely correlated
+11.67%
More