CESDF
Price
$5.92
Change
-$0.02 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
WFRD
Price
$63.69
Change
+$2.13 (+3.46%)
Updated
Aug 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.42B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs WFRD

Header iconCESDF vs WFRD Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs WFRDBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$5.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.34%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization1.3B
Weatherford International
Price$63.69
Change+$2.13 (+3.46%)
Volume$21.29K
Capitalization4.42B
CESDF vs WFRD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. WFRD commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Buy and WFRD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $5.92 vs. WFRD: $61.56)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and WFRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 93% vs. WFRD: 114%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $1.3B vs. WFRD: $4.42B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.3B. WFRD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $52.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFRD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than WFRD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFRD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than WFRD.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.96% price change this week, while WFRD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +9.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFRD is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.48% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRD($4.42B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($1.3B). CESDF has higher P/E ratio than WFRD: CESDF (10.23) vs WFRD (9.49). WFRD YTD gains are higher at: -12.875 vs. CESDF (-14.078). WFRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.08B vs. CESDF (370M). CESDF has less debt than WFRD: CESDF (471M) vs WFRD (1.75B). WFRD has higher revenues than CESDF: WFRD (5.15B) vs CESDF (2.42B).
CESDFWFRDCESDF / WFRD
Capitalization1.3B4.42B29%
EBITDA370M1.08B34%
Gain YTD-14.078-12.875109%
P/E Ratio10.239.49108%
Revenue2.42B5.15B47%
Total CashN/A943M-
Total Debt471M1.75B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFWFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGSVX22.310.17
+0.77%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R5
JUEZX26.730.13
+0.49%
JPMorgan US Equity R2
HHCAX16.25N/A
N/A
NexPoint Event Driven A
SRVEX24.60N/A
N/A
Victory Diversified Stock A
JAWGX76.34N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson VIT Global Rsrch Instl

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-0.34%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More

WFRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFRD has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFRD jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRD
1D Price
Change %
WFRD100%
-0.68%
SLB - WFRD
81%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
HAL - WFRD
80%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
OII - WFRD
79%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
RES - WFRD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
WHD - WFRD
74%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
More