Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CESGX vs RMFCX
CESGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CESGX vs RMFCX
Coho Relative Value ESG
Price$12.40
Change+$0.72 (+6.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.31M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.42
Change+$0.77 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.72B
CESGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CESGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CESGX (29.3M). CESGX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CESGX (1.91) vs RMFCX (1.20). CESGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CESGX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CESGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CESGX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CESGX: RMFCX (250) vs CESGX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. CESGX (-2.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.13 vs. CESGX (13.95).
| CESGX | RMFCX | CESGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.366 | 13.522 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.20 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.75 | 5.50 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.27 | 42.73 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.95 | 57.13 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement