Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIHX
CEUFX vs FCIHX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIHX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.57
Change+$0.54 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.91
Change+$0.15 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets787.39M
CEUFX vs FCIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIHX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FCIHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCIHX (787M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIHX: CEUFX (0.78) vs FCIHX (0.65). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIHX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIHX (2 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIHX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: CEUFX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. FCIHX (3.32).
| CEUFX | FCIHX | CEUFX / FCIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.85 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.408 | 10.419 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 787M | 17,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.65 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 3.32 | 347% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.84 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.24 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.57 | 81.42 | 72% |