Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$60.73
Change-$0.22 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.56B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.15M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FCIWX (884M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.83) vs FCIWX (0.63). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. FCIWX (5.20). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 45.62 vs. CEUFX (17.63).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.128 | 7.980 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 884M | 15,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 5.20 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.21 | 37.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.63 | 45.62 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement