Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.13
Change-$0.27 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$18.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets784.68M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FCIWX (785M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.78) vs FCIWX (0.63). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. FCIWX (4.91). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 42.24 vs. CEUFX (16.57).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.085 | 11.971 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 785M | 17,580% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.63 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 4.91 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.61 | 58.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.57 | 42.24 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers