Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$59.02
Change+$0.66 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.03B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets866.13M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIWX (866M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (1.21) vs FCIWX (0.64). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.67 vs. FCIWX (1.94). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 54.77 vs. CEUFX (21.04).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.886 | 6.691 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 866M | 15,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.64 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.67 | 1.94 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.46 | 39.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.04 | 54.77 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | N/A | - |