Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FNGZX
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.68
Change-$0.26 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$17.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets720.77M
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FNGZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and FNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FNGZX (721M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: FNGZX (1.85) vs CEUFX (0.76). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). FNGZX (0.95) and CEUFX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: CEUFX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. FNGZX (3.93). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.68 vs. FNGZX (-11.91).
| CEUFX | FNGZX | CEUFX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.825 | 6.552 | 287% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132B | 721M | 18,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 3.93 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.19 | 19.93 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.68 | -11.91 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.70 | 66.83 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement