Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FNGZX
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$61.52
Change+$0.42 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.39
Change+$0.36 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.6M
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FNGZX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and FNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FNGZX (836M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: FNGZX (1.87) vs CEUFX (0.81). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). FNGZX (0.95) and CEUFX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: CEUFX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. FNGZX (9.08). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.24 vs. FNGZX (-1.73).
| CEUFX | FNGZX | CEUFX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.829 | 11.635 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 836M | 15,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.87 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 9.08 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.86 | 27.38 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.24 | -1.73 | -825% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.70 | 80.99 | 64% |