Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FNGZX
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.57
Change+$0.54 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.83
Change+$0.09 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets837.03M
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FNGZX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FNGZX (837M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: FNGZX (1.84) vs CEUFX (0.78). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). FNGZX (0.95) and CEUFX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: CEUFX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. FNGZX (7.72). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.24 vs. FNGZX (-0.54).
| CEUFX | FNGZX | CEUFX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.408 | 14.758 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 837M | 16,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.84 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 7.72 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.84 | 39.64 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.24 | -0.54 | -3,781% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.57 | 84.82 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement