Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs GSIMX
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs GSIMX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$60.95
Change+$1.17 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.03B
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
Price$22.67
Change+$0.17 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.71B
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. GSIMX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and GSIMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. GSIMX (53.7B). GSIMX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: GSIMX (1.90) vs CEUFX (0.83). CEUFX was incepted earlier than GSIMX: CEUFX (23 years) vs GSIMX (9 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GSIMX (0.80). GSIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSIMX: CEUFX (250) vs GSIMX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. GSIMX (-1.08). GSIMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.80 vs. CEUFX (18.06).
| CEUFX | GSIMX | CEUFX / GSIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.77 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.545 | 15.031 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 53.7B | 250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | -1.08 | -730% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.90 | 48.13 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.06 | 52.80 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement