Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs GSIMX
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs GSIMX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.07
Change+$0.68 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
Price$23.33
Change+$0.14 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.25B
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. GSIMX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and GSIMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. GSIMX (55.3B). GSIMX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: GSIMX (1.91) vs CEUFX (0.76). CEUFX was incepted earlier than GSIMX: CEUFX (23 years) vs GSIMX (9 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GSIMX (0.80). GSIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSIMX: CEUFX (250) vs GSIMX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.61 vs. GSIMX (10.97). GSIMX return over 5 years is better than : 50.53 vs. CEUFX (5.41).
| CEUFX | GSIMX | CEUFX / GSIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.77 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.460 | 19.274 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 55.3B | 242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.91 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.61 | 10.97 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.62 | 47.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.41 | 50.53 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers