Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs GSIMX
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs GSIMX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.15
Change-$0.34 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
Price$22.79
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.51B
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. GSIMX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and GSIMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. GSIMX (54.5B). GSIMX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: GSIMX (1.90) vs CEUFX (0.78). CEUFX was incepted earlier than GSIMX: CEUFX (23 years) vs GSIMX (9 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GSIMX (0.80). GSIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSIMX: CEUFX (250) vs GSIMX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. GSIMX (2.04). GSIMX return over 5 years is better than : 47.87 vs. CEUFX (16.14).
| CEUFX | GSIMX | CEUFX / GSIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.77 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.611 | 16.769 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 54.5B | 253% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.90 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 2.04 | 505% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.97 | 58.94 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.14 | 47.87 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement