Ad is loading...
CEUFX vs MNOSX
CEUFX vs MNOSX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOSX
American Funds Europacific Growth 529F1
Price$56.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.94B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$35.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.13M
CEUFX vs MNOSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and MNOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. MNOSX (356M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than MNOSX: CEUFX (1.28) vs MNOSX (0.94). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOSX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOSX (7 years). MNOSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CEUFX (0.92). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (30.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). MNOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.88 vs. CEUFX (-0.63). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.27 vs. CEUFX (28.43).
| CEUFX | MNOSX | CEUFX / MNOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.06 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.261 | 9.294 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129B | 356M | 36,236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.63 | 9.88 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.52 | 31.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.43 | 62.27 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers