Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOSX
CEUFX vs MNOSX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOSX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.68
Change-$0.26 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$36.05
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.12M
CEUFX vs MNOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. MNOSX (326M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOSX (0.89) vs CEUFX (0.76). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOSX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOSX (7 years). MNOSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CEUFX (0.91). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. MNOSX (12.15). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.72 vs. CEUFX (5.68).
| CEUFX | MNOSX | CEUFX / MNOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.06 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.825 | 12.279 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132B | 326M | 40,491% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 12.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.19 | 37.32 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.68 | 22.72 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement