Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOSX
CEUFX vs MNOSX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOSX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$61.15
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$36.83
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.86M
CEUFX vs MNOSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOSX (366M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOSX (0.92) vs CEUFX (0.84). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOSX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOSX (7 years). MNOSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CEUFX (0.91). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). MNOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. CEUFX (6.17). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. CEUFX (11.54).
| CEUFX | MNOSX | CEUFX / MNOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.06 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.924 | 14.392 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 366M | 36,885% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.92 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 7.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.08 | 42.33 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.54 | 32.85 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.40 | N/A | - |