Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.40
Change+$0.41 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.71
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.18M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. MNOZX (347M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOZX (1.20) vs CEUFX (0.78). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.14 vs. MNOZX (8.16). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. CEUFX (16.57).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.085 | 13.783 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 347M | 39,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.14 | 8.16 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.74 | 57.01 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.57 | 35.92 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement