Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$57.95
Change-$0.79 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.01
Change-$0.56 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.4M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and MNOZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. MNOZX (362M). MNOZX (1.24) and CEUFX (1.21) have matching dividends . CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). CEUFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (30.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.85 vs. CEUFX (3.61). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 58.70 vs. CEUFX (21.25).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.66 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.71 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.858 | 13.783 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 362M | 36,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 11.85 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.68 | 45.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.25 | 58.70 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement