Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.94
Change-$0.86 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.2B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.21
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.47M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. MNOZX (326M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOZX (1.21) vs CEUFX (0.76). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. MNOZX (12.71). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 25.47 vs. CEUFX (6.60).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.318 | 12.757 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 326M | 41,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.21 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 12.71 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.75 | 39.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.60 | 25.47 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers