Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs OIGCX
CEUFX vs OIGCX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs OIGCX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$60.41
Change-$0.32 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr C
Price$31.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
CEUFX vs OIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. OIGCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and OIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. OIGCX (5.13B). CEUFX pays higher dividends than OIGCX: CEUFX (0.83) vs OIGCX (0.00). CEUFX was incepted earlier than OIGCX: CEUFX (23 years) vs OIGCX (29 years). OIGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than CEUFX (0.91). CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. OIGCX (10.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OIGCX: CEUFX (250) vs OIGCX (1000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. OIGCX (-2.55). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.01 vs. OIGCX (-25.72).
| CEUFX | OIGCX | CEUFX / OIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.86 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.86 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.521 | 12.784 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 5.13B | 2,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | -2.55 | -388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 4.96 | 644% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.01 | -25.72 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.82 | -10.57 | -377% |