Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs WBIRX
CEUFX vs WBIRX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs WBIRX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.57
Change-$0.52 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.46B
William Blair International Growth R6
Price$31.32
Change-$0.28 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
CEUFX vs WBIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. WBIRX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and WBIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. WBIRX (1.26B). WBIRX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: WBIRX (1.42) vs CEUFX (0.81). CEUFX was incepted earlier than WBIRX: CEUFX (23 years) vs WBIRX (6 years). CEUFX (0.91) and WBIRX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . WBIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBIRX: CEUFX (250) vs WBIRX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. WBIRX (2.68). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.38 vs. WBIRX (-3.70).
| CEUFX | WBIRX | CEUFX / WBIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.85 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.616 | 15.582 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 1.26B | 10,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.42 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 2.68 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 32.59 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.38 | -3.70 | -497% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement