It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CEVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CEVA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CEVA (@Semiconductors) experienced а -4.46% price change this week, while CRUS (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.61%.
CEVA is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
CRUS is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
CEVA | CRUS | CEVA / CRUS | |
Capitalization | 638M | 5.35B | 12% |
EBITDA | -6.46M | 447M | -1% |
Gain YTD | 18.934 | 21.012 | 90% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 17.12 | - |
Revenue | 98.7M | 1.85B | 5% |
Total Cash | 158M | 517M | 31% |
Total Debt | 5.58M | 154M | 4% |
CEVA | CRUS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRUS's Valuation (76) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CEVA (96). This means that CRUS’s stock grew similarly to CEVA’s over the last 12 months.
CRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEVA (100). This means that CRUS’s stock grew significantly faster than CEVA’s over the last 12 months.
CRUS's SMR Rating (52) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVA (87). This means that CRUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVA’s over the last 12 months.
CEVA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CRUS (63). This means that CEVA’s stock grew similarly to CRUS’s over the last 12 months.
CRUS's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CEVA (99). This means that CRUS’s stock grew similarly to CEVA’s over the last 12 months.
CEVA | CRUS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago74% | 6 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 5 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PFLD | 21.06 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
AAM Low Duration Pref & Inc Secs ETF | |||
USVN | 47.23 | N/A | N/A |
US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF | |||
QWLD | 126.49 | -1.26 | -0.99% |
SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | |||
PRFZ | 42.85 | -0.53 | -1.22% |
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | |||
ROMO | 31.71 | -0.40 | -1.24% |
Strategy Shares Nwfnd/RSlv Rbt Mmt ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CEVA has been closely correlated with AMKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CEVA jumps, then AMKR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CEVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CEVA | 100% | -1.35% | ||
AMKR - CEVA | 70% Closely correlated | -3.19% | ||
INTC - CEVA | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.72% | ||
PLAB - CEVA | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.10% | ||
POWI - CEVA | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
CRUS - CEVA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRUS has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRUS jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRUS | 100% | -0.82% | ||
SWKS - CRUS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
ADI - CRUS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
NXPI - CRUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.09% | ||
POWI - CRUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
QCOM - CRUS | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
More |