Advertisement
CEVMF vs CPXGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEVMF is a Hold and CPXGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CEVMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCPXGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CEVMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- CPXGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CEVMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPXGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CEVMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- CPXGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CEVMF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CPXGF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +2.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.29%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (+3.18% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| CEVMF | CPXGF | CEVMF / CPXGF | |
| Capitalization | 6.53B | 440M | 1,485% |
| EBITDA | 452M | 353M | 128% |
| Gain YTD | 46.616 | 0.323 | 14,436% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.04 | 48.54 | 54% |
| Revenue | 2.15B | 1.38B | 156% |
| Total Cash | 1.36B | 19.7M | 6,909% |
| Total Debt | 120M | 1.94B | 6% |
CEVMF | CPXGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPXGF's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CEVMF (88). This means that CPXGF’s stock grew similarly to CEVMF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPXGF (100). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPXGF (100). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXGF (45). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew similarly to CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.
CPXGF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CEVMF (21). This means that CPXGF’s stock grew similarly to CEVMF’s over the last 12 months.
| CEVMF | CPXGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 22% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 3 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ATECX | 109.38 | 0.82 | +0.76% |
| AB Sustainable Global Thematic C | |||
| FERRX | 11.85 | 0.07 | +0.59% |
| First Eagle Global Real Assets R6 | |||
| AWTIX | 20.79 | 0.07 | +0.34% |
| Virtus Duff & Phelps Water Inst | |||
| DEMZX | 26.63 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| Macquarie Emerging Markets R6 | |||
| IGNAX | 16.77 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Macquarie Natural Resources A | |||
CEVMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CEVMF and TOON have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEVMF and TOON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CEVMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEVMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOON - CEVMF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| MCOIF - CEVMF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CPXGF - CEVMF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CJREF - CEVMF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
| ICABY - CEVMF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CPXGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPXGF and NWSA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPXGF and NWSA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPXGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPXGF | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| NWSA - CPXGF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| NWS - CPXGF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| MSGS - CPXGF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| BATRA - CPXGF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| FOX - CPXGF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||