Ad is loading...
CEYIX vs GFACX
CEYIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CEYIX vs GFACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$53.85
Change-$3.31 (-5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.01B
CEYIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEYIX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEYIX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. CEYIX (5.75B). CEYIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CEYIX (0.31) vs GFACX (0.00). CEYIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CEYIX (25 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CEYIX (0.65). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CEYIX (9.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEYIX: GFACX (250) vs CEYIX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. CEYIX (-2.21). CEYIX return over 5 years is better than : 73.17 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| CEYIX | GFACX | CEYIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.36 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.36 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.226 | -5.003 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.75B | 264B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.21 | -1.75 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.54 | 0.63 | 878% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.17 | 59.73 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.45 | 44.46 | 167% |