It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while FMC (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -8.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.80%.
CF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
FMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
CF | FMC | CF / FMC | |
Capitalization | 15.6B | 7.83B | 199% |
EBITDA | 3.26B | 722M | 452% |
Gain YTD | 9.292 | -9.067 | -102% |
P/E Ratio | 10.59 | 5.55 | 191% |
Revenue | 6.63B | 4.49B | 148% |
Total Cash | 2.03B | 302M | 673% |
Total Debt | 3.23B | 4.11B | 79% |
CF | FMC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMC's Valuation (42) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (96). This means that FMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMC (100). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMC’s over the last 12 months.
FMC's SMR Rating (26) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (44). This means that FMC’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as FMC (61). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to FMC’s over the last 12 months.
CF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMC (97). This means that CF’s stock grew significantly faster than FMC’s over the last 12 months.
CF | FMC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago75% | 10 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago73% | 2 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SCZ | 62.41 | -0.13 | -0.21% |
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | |||
PCEF | 19.52 | -0.07 | -0.37% |
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | |||
TBJL | 19.85 | -0.08 | -0.41% |
Innovator 20+ Year Tsy Bd Bfr ETF July | |||
FXA | 64.18 | -0.55 | -0.86% |
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
BKCH | 64.80 | -7.07 | -9.84% |
Global X Blockchain ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CF jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CF | 100% | +1.18% | ||
MOS - CF | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
NTR - CF | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
YARIY - CF | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
IPI - CF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
KPLUY - CF | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMC has been loosely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMC jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.